• ISSN: 2148-2225 (online)

Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Kongreleri

alphanumeric journal

The Journal of Operations Research, Statistics, Econometrics and Management Information Systems

Investigation of Smart City Components by AHP-BWM-FUCOM and DEMATEL Methods

bib

Emre Ekin, Ph.D.

L. Sinem Sarul, Ph.D.


Abstract

The concept of a smart city has emerged with the development of technology in the 21st century, based on the ideal city concept introduced in the 19th century. Increasing number of people move from rural to urban cities with the rapid increase in the world population. As a result of this, smart city concept become more important all over the world. Smart city components which makes a city turn out to a smart city is investigated in the literature very widely. Although over forty smart city components can be counted in the literature, the main six elements which are smart economy, smart people, smart governance, smart mobility, smart environment and smart living are mostly included in the studies. In this study, these six main smart city components is weighted by one of the most widely used MCDM techniques AHP, DEMATEL and more recently developed techniques BWM and FUCOM. According to the results of analysis, Smart Governance is the most important criteria according to the AHP, BWM and FUCOM methods, while Smart Economy is the most important criteria according to the DEMATEL method. At the same time, Smart people are the least important factor according to the AHP, BWM and FUCOM methods, while Smart Governance is the least important factor according to the DEMATEL.

Keywords: AHP, BWM, Criteria Weighting, DEMATEL, FUCOM, Smart City, Smart City Components

Jel Classification: C46

Suggested citation

Ekin, E. & Sarul, L. (). Investigation of Smart City Components by AHP-BWM-FUCOM and DEMATEL Methods. Alphanumeric Journal, 10(2), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1210018

References

  • Adali, E.A.(2022), Assessment of European cities from a smartness perspective: An integrated grey MCDM approach, Sustainable Cities and Society ,84, 104021
  • Akgül, M. K. (2013). “Kentlerin e-Dönüşümü Akıllı Kentler S.291, http://anahtar.sanayi.gov.tr /tr/news/kentlerin-e-donusumu-akillikentler/416 (Access date: 15.12.2017). Verimlilik Dergisi.
  • Akıllı Kentler Nedir(Online). https://www.akillikentler.org/akilli-kentler-nedir-7.html
  • Akıllı Kent Yonetim Sistemleri(Online) https://www.akillikentler.org/akilli-kent-yonetim-sistemleri-202.html
  • Aksoğan, M., & Duman, M. Ç. (2018). Akıllı Şehir Uygulamaları; Malatya Örneği. 1. Uluslararası Battalgazi Multi Disipliner Çalışmalar Kongresi Tam Metin Kitabı Cilt I (s. 183-202). Malatya: İktisadi Kalkınma ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Enstitüsü. 1. Uluslararası Battalgazi Multi Disipliner Çalışmalar Kongresi Tam Metin Kitabı Cilt I (s. 183-202). Malatya: İktisadi Kalkınma ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Enstitüsü.
  • Alkan, T. (2015). “Akıllı Kentler ya da 21. Yüzyıl Şehirleri”. Bilişim Dergisi(182), s. 70-77.
  • Armağan, M. V. (2018, Eylül). Bilgi Toplumunda Akıllı Şehirler ve Katılımcı Yurttaşlık. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Arsu, T. &. (2021). Personel Seçim Sürecinde Kullanılan Kriterlerin Best-Worst Metodu (Bwm) İle Değerlendirilmesi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, s. 1949-1967.
  • ASÜD. (2016). E-Haber, https://www.asuder.org.tr /akilli-sehir-nedir-turkiyede-akilli-se“Akıllı Şehir Nedir? Türkiye’de Akıllı Şehir Uygulamaları”. adresinden alındı
  • Ateş, M. (2018). Akıllı Şehir Kavramı: Kentsel ve Mekansal Boyutu Burdur Mehmet AKif Ersoy Üniversitesi. 7. Türkiye Lisansüstü Çalışmalar Bildiriler Kitabı-III (s. 117-130). Burdur: Burdur Mehmet AKif Ersoy Üniversitesi.
  • Biçakcı, H. (2014). Yeni Kent Tasarımı ve Akıllı Kentler: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz ve Samsun İçin Model Önerisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi Ondokuzmayıs Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Bilgiç, S., Torğul, B., & Paksoy, T. (2021). Sürdürülebilir Enerji Yönetimi İçin BWM Yöntemi İle Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Değerlendirilmesi. Verimlilik Dergisi, 95-110.
  • Bilici, Z., & Babahanoğlu, V. (2018). “Akıllı Kent Uygulamaları ve Konya Örneği”. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 9(2), s. 124-139.
  • Bulut, C. (2018). Bulut Bilişim (Cloud Computing) Nedir? E-Makale, https://www.endustri40.com/bulut-bilisim-cloud-computing-nedir/, (Access date : 19.03.2019).
  • Canlı, E. (2019). Dijital Çağın Dönüşen Kentleri Akıllı Kentler: Londra Örneği.
  • Cerci, İ. N. (2015). Akıllı kentler, Bir İhtiyaç ve Geleceğe Dönük Bir Yaşam Modelidir. Bilişim Dergisi, s. 196-201.
  • Chang, C.W. et. al.(2007), An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol.52 pp. 296–307
  • Deloitte. (2016). Akıllı Şehir Yol Haritası. E-Makale, https://www.sehirsizin.com/Documents/ DeloitteVodafone-Akilli-Sehir-Yol-Haritasi.pdf.
  • Demirci, E., Kılıç. H.S.(2019), Personnel Selection based on integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques, Int.Adv.Eng. Pure Sci., 2:163-178
  • Ecer, F. (2021). FUCOM sübjektif ağırlıklandırma yöntemi ile rüzgâr çiftliği yer seçimini etkileyen faktörlerin analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilim Dergisi, 24-34.
  • Elvan, L. (2017). Akıllı Şehirler: Lüks Değil İhtiyaç. İTÜ Vakfı Dergisi, s. 6-9.
  • Fortune. (2017). “Yol Açın! Akıllı Şehirler Geliyor”. http://www.fortuneTurkiye.com/yol-acin-akilli sehirler-geliyor-45878, (Erişim Tarihi: 28.12.2017).
  • Giffinger, R. (2007). “Smart Cities Ranking Of European Medium-Sized Cities”. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology Research Report.
  • Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument For The Positioning Of The Cities. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment(12), s. 7-26.
  • Gürsoy, O. (2019). Akıllı Kent Yaklaşımı ve Türkiye’deki Büyükşehirler İçin Uygulama İmkanları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Harrison, C., & Donnelly, I. A. (2011). A Theory of Smart Cities. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, (s. 1-15). Hull, UK.
  • Hayek, P.(2022), Recent developments in smart city assessment: A bibliometric and content analysis-based literature review, Cities 126, 103709
  • ISBAK. (2017, 12 28). Akıllı Şehrin Mimarı: İSBAK . E-Makale, http://isbak.istanbul/akilli-sehirler-3/, (ErişimTarihi: 28/12/2017).
  • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediye Başkanlığı. (2017). İBB Türkiye’nin İlk Uluslararası Standartta Veri Merkezini Kurdu. E-Haber, https://www.ibb.istanbul/News/Detail/34231, (Access date: 30.12.2017).
  • Kabak, M., Çınar, Y.(2020), Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri, MS Excel Uygulamalar, Nobel yay., Ankara
  • Koca et.al. (2021), Evaluation of the smart city: Applying the dematel technique, Telematics and Informatics 62, 10162
  • Lai, S.L. et.al.(2002), Group Decision Making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection, European Journal of Operational Research 137(2002),134-144
  • Mangır, F. (2016). “Smart City: Strategies For Local Governments: The Case Of Konya In Turkiye”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi(41.Yıl Özel Sayısı), s. 17-36.
  • Orselli, E., & Akbay, C. (2019). Teknoloji ve Kent Yaşamında Dönüşüm: Akıllı Kentler. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 2(1), s. 228-241.
  • Ozkaya,G., Erdin,C.(2020), Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique, Heliyon6, Volume 6, Issue 10, October 2020, e05052, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05052
  • Pamucar, D., & Ecer, F. (2020). Prioritizing the weights of the evaluation criteria under fuzziness: The fuzzy full consistency method–FUCOM. Facta Universitatis Series : Mechanical Engineering, 419-437.
  • Pamucar, Stevic, D., & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM), Symmetry, 1-22.
  • Podvezko, V.(2019), Application of AHP technique, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(2): 181–189
  • Rani, S., Kumar, R.(2022), Bibliometric review of actuators: Key automation technology in a smart city framework, Materials Today: Proceedings 60, pp. 1800–1807.
  • Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. Omega, 49-50.
  • Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: Some Properties And A Linear Model. Omega, s. 126-130.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, and Resources Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  • Saaty, T.L. (2008), “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”, International Journal of Services Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 83-98.
  • Saha, A., Roy, R.(2021), An Integrated approach to identify suitable areas for buit-up development using GIS-based multicriteria analysis and AHP in Siliguri planning area, India, SN Applied Sciences, Springer Nature Journal 3:395 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04354-5
  • Singhal, D. et. al.(2018), DEMATEL approach for analyzing the critical factors in remanufacturing process, Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (2018) 18568–18573
  • Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Smart Cities: Quality Of Life, Productivity, And The Growth Effects Of Human Capital. The Review of Economics And Statistics(2), s. 324-335.
  • Si, S.L. et. al. (2018), DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications, Hindawi Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 3696457 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457
  • Uçar, A., Şemşit, S., & Negiz, N. (2017). Avrupa Birliği Akıllı Kent Uygulamaları ve ve Türkiye’deki Yansımaları. SDÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(Kayfor15 Özel Sayısı), s. 1785-1798.
  • Varol, Ç. (2017). Sürdürülebilir Gelişme de Akıllı Kent Yaklaşımı : Ankara’daki Belediyelerin Uygulamaları. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler(1), s. 43-58.
  • Yenkar, P.P., Sawarkar, S.D., A novel ensemble approach based on MCC and MCDM methods for prioritizing tweets mentioning urban issues in smart city, Kybernetes , Emerald Publishing Limited 0368-492X DOI 10.1108/K-08-2021-0785. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2021-0785

Volume 10, Issue 2, 2022

2022.10.02.OR.03

alphanumeric journal

Volume 10, Issue 2, 2022

Pages 197-222

Received: Nov. 25, 2022

Accepted: Dec. 30, 2022

Published: Dec. 31, 2022

Full Text [1.0 MB]

2022 Ekin, E., Sarul, L.

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Creative Commons Attribution licence

scan QR code to access this article from your mobile device

Contact Us

Faculty of Transportation and Logistics, Istanbul University
Beyazit Campus 34452 Fatih/Istanbul/TURKEY

Bahadır Fatih Yıldırım, Ph.D.
editor@alphanumericjournal.com
+ 90 (212) 440 00 00 - 13219

alphanumeric journal

alphanumeric journal has been publishing as "International Peer-Reviewed Journal" every six months since 2013. alphanumeric serves as a vehicle for researchers and practitioners in the field of quantitative methods, and is enabling a process of sharing in all fields related to the operations research, statistics, econometrics and management informations systems in order to enhance the quality on a globe scale.