• ISSN: 2148-2225 (online)

Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Kongreleri

alphanumeric journal

The Journal of Operations Research, Statistics, Econometrics and Management Information Systems

Do Astrological Beliefs Reflects Systematic Bias in Personality Measurement?

Gözde Bozkurt

Ahmet Mete Çilingirtürk, Ph.D.


Personality is a complex concept specified by many factors and separated from character concept in many ways. Astrology is an ancient study that involves classifications based upon the zodiac and regarded now as a pseudo-science. In this study, aim was to investigate the effect of the astrological personality on the personality characteristics, which were measured by the Five Factor Personality Model. The research studies finding that the pre-scientific beliefs had an effect on personality measurements, motivates to accept the astrological groupings as a factor on explaining the personality and trait. The significant effects indicates either a direct reasoning or a systematic bias without questioning the belief of respondent.

Keywords: Astrology, Astropsychology, Five Factor Personality Model, Multivariate Analysis of Variance, Personality, Personality Characteristics

Jel Classification: C46

Suggested citation

Bozkurt, G., Çilingirtürk, AM. (2021). Do Astrological Beliefs Reflects Systematic Bias in Personality Measurement?. Alphanumeric Journal, 9(2), 217-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.908546


  • Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Superstition, education and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1227-1236.
  • Aharoni, E., Antonenko, O. & Kiehl, K.A. (2011). Disparities in the moral intuitions of criminal offenders: The role of prychpathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 322-327.
  • Albayrak, A.S. (2006). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara: Asil Publishing, 499.
  • Allum, N. (2010). What Makes Some People Think Astrology is Scientific?. Science Communication, 33(3), 341-366.
  • Aşan Ö. & Aydin E. (2006). Örgütsel Davranış, Denizli: Arıkan Publishing, 77.
  • Basim, H.J., Çetin F. & Tabak A. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20-34.
  • Buck, S. (2018). Hiding in plain sight: Jung, astrology, and the psychology of the unconscious. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 63(2), 207-227.
  • Büyüköztürk Ş., (1997). İki Faktörlü Varyans Analizi. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal, 30(1), 141-158.
  • Costa, P., McCrae, R.R. & Dye, D.A. (1991). Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A revision of The NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887-898.
  • Dıgman, J.M. & Inouye, J. (1986). Further Specification of The Five Robust Factors of Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 116-123.
  • Doğan, T. (2013). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri ve Öznel İyi Oluş, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(1), 56-64.
  • Gaarder, J. (2013). Sofie’nin Dünyası (34th ed., trans. S. Yücesoy). Istanbul: Pan Publishing, 64.
  • Güney, S. (2011). Davranış Bilimleri (6th ed.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing, 15-197.
  • Hall, C. S. &, Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of Personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hjelle, L.A. & Ziegler, D.J. (1992). Personality Theories (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 30.
  • Jobson, J.D. (1992). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis (Vol. II). New York: Springer-Verlag Inc., 215.
  • Jung, C. G. (1947). On the Nature of the Psyche. London: Ark Paperbacks.
  • Jung, S.A. & Yang, C.S. (2015). Relations between Eastern Four Pillars Theory and Western Measures of Personality Traits. Yonsei Medical Journal, 56(3), 698-704.
  • Lindeman, M. & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 731-744.
  • Micceri, T. (1989). The Unicorn, the Normal Curve, and Other Improbable Creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156-166.
  • Nias, D.K.B. (2016). Hans Eysenck: Sex and violence on television, the paranormal, graphology, and astrology. Personality and Indıvıdual Differences, 103, 140-147.
  • Olson, C.L. (1974). Comparative Robustness of Six Tests in Multivariate Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 894-908.
  • Oxford Dictionary, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/personality, Date of Access: 11 April 2016.
  • Özgür, U. (2006). Felsefi Farklılaşma Sorulardan Değil Cevaplardan Doğar: Sofistler ve Platon. Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences, 1, 69-76.
  • Perry, G. (1992). The new paradigm and postmodern astrology. Astrological Journal, 34, 139-146.
  • Propat, A.E. and Corr, P.J. (2015). Thinking bigger: The Cronbachian paradigm & personality theory integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 56-69.
  • Rogers, C.R. (2011). Kişi Olmaya Dair (trans. A. Babacan). Istanbul: Okuyanus Yayıncılık, 176.
  • Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L.R. (1996). Evidence for The Big Five in Analyses of Familiar English Personality Adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10(1), 61-77.
  • Scheiner, S.M., & Gurevitch, J. (1993). Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. New York: ITP Publishing, Chapman & Hall, Dept., BC, 110.
  • Steyn, R. (2011). Astrological Signs and Personality Differences. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 21(1), 493-494.
  • Şimşek, A. & Eroğlu, Ö. (2013). Davranış Bilimleri. Konya: Eğitim Publishing, 257.
  • Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Northridge: Pearson Education, 281.
  • Taggar, S., Hackett R. & Saha S. (1999). Leadership Emergence in Autonomous Work Teams: Antecedents and Outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 52(4), 899.
  • Tutar, H. (2012). Sosyal Psikoloji. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing, 81-304.
  • Velicer, W.F. & Fava, J.L. (1998). Effects of Variable and Subject Sampling on Factor Pattern Recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231-251.
  • Whitworth, B.S. (2008). Is There a Relationship Between Personality Type and Preferred Conflict-Handling Styles? An Exploratory Study of Registered Nurses in Southern Mississippi. Journal of Nursing Management, 16, 923.
  • Wilcox, R.R. (2012). Modern Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, A Practical Introduction. Los Angeles: CRC Press, University of Southern California, 135-140.
  • Young, P.V. (1968). Bilimsel Sosyal İncelemeler ve Araştırma. Ankara: Ege Publishing, 324.

Volume 9, Issue 2, 2021


alphanumeric journal

Volume 9, Issue 2, 2021

Pages 217-228

Received: April 2, 2021

Accepted: Oct. 22, 2021

Published: Dec. 31, 2021

Full Text [496.7 KB]

  • Share

2021 Bozkurt, G., Çilingirtürk, AM.

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Creative Commons Attribution licence

scan QR code to access this article from your mobile device

Contact Us

School of Transportation and Logistics, Istanbul University
Avcilar Campus 34320 Avcilar/Istanbul/TURKEY

Bahadır Fatih Yıldırım, Ph.D.
+ 90 (212) 473 70 00 - 19263

alphanumeric journal

alphanumeric journal has been publishing as "International Peer-Reviewed Journal" every six months since 2013. alphanumeric serves as a vehicle for researchers and practitioners in the field of quantitative methods, and is enabling a process of sharing in all fields related to the operations research, statistics, econometrics and management informations systems in order to enhance the quality on a globe scale.